Let’s dismantle this notion of “naturally” as it slithers its way into our discourse, particularly as it pertains to feminism. We’ve all heard it. “Women are *naturally* more nurturing.” “Men are *naturally* more aggressive.” These are not innocent observations; they are insidious justifications for the patriarchal status quo, linguistic landmines planted to derail our progress. We must challenge them. We must dissect them. We must obliterate them.
This is not merely about semantics. It’s about power. It’s about the subtle, pervasive ways in which societal expectations are codified and enforced, rendering gender roles seemingly immutable and, therefore, unassailable. The deployment of “naturally” in this context is a rhetorical sleight of hand, an attempt to naturalize what is, in reality, a complex tapestry woven from social conditioning, historical oppression, and systemic bias. Are we truly accepting this as a group? We need to be better.
Our exploration will delve into the philosophical underpinnings of this “natural” narrative. We will unpack its historical roots, its contemporary manifestations, and its devastating impact on feminist praxis. Prepare to question everything. Prepare to be uncomfortable. Prepare to have your assumptions shattered. This is not a gentle stroll through a theoretical garden; it is a full-frontal assault on the very foundations of gender inequality.
I. The Tyranny of “Naturally”: Deconstructing the Myth of Innate Difference
At its core, the appeal to “nature” is a fallacy. It assumes that certain traits, behaviors, and abilities are inherent to biological sex, conveniently ignoring the overwhelming evidence of cultural influence and individual variation. This essentialist perspective serves to reinforce harmful stereotypes and limit the potential of individuals based solely on their perceived gender. When someone declares something is “natural” we should immediately question it. Why? Who benefits? How does this pronouncement uphold the system?
The concept of innate difference is especially pernicious because it provides a seemingly unassailable justification for existing power structures. If women are “naturally” more nurturing, then their primary role is in the domestic sphere, caring for children and supporting their husbands. If men are “naturally” more aggressive, then their dominance in leadership positions is simply a reflection of their inherent aptitude. This logic, however flawed, is remarkably resilient. We see it manifest constantly. It’s the reason female CEOs face more scrutiny. It’s the reason women’s accomplishments are often downplayed, attributed to luck or collaboration rather than individual brilliance.
Furthermore, the “natural” argument often overlooks the vast diversity within each gender. To claim that all women are inherently nurturing is to erase the experiences of those who defy this stereotype, who prioritize career over family, who express their femininity in unconventional ways. Similarly, to assert that all men are naturally aggressive ignores the countless men who embrace vulnerability, empathy, and compassion. We are not monolithic. We are complex, multifaceted individuals shaped by a myriad of factors. The insistence on essentialist categories is not only inaccurate but also deeply oppressive.
II. Historical Roots: Tracing the Evolution of Naturalized Inequality
The idea that gender roles are divinely ordained or biologically predetermined is not new. Throughout history, various philosophical and religious traditions have sought to justify male dominance by appealing to a higher power or an immutable natural order. From Aristotle’s notion of women as “incomplete” men to the biblical story of Eve’s subordination to Adam, the narrative of inherent female inferiority has been woven into the fabric of Western thought. We need to reexamine these myths. We need to actively rewrite the stories that bind us. What if Eve was not a temptress but a curious seeker of knowledge? What if Lilith, Adam’s first wife who refused to be subservient, was not a demon but a proto-feminist hero?
The Enlightenment, while championing reason and individual rights, paradoxically reinforced certain gender stereotypes. Philosophers like Rousseau argued that women’s primary role was to educate and nurture men, thereby solidifying their dependence on male authority. Even as revolutions were fought in the name of liberty and equality, women were largely excluded from the fruits of these revolutions. Their roles were still primarily relegated to the domestic sphere. Their voices were still silenced in the public square.
The rise of scientific racism in the 19th century further cemented the notion of biological difference, with pseudo-scientific theories used to justify the subjugation of both women and people of color. Craniometry, for example, purported to demonstrate that women and non-white individuals had smaller brains and were therefore less intelligent than white men. These grotesque and ultimately discredited theories nonetheless had a profound impact on social attitudes and policies. It is crucial to recognize that the rhetoric of “natural” difference has always been intertwined with other forms of oppression. It is a tool used to maintain hierarchies of power and privilege.
III. Contemporary Manifestations: “Naturally” in the 21st Century
While overt expressions of sexism may be less common in some circles, the subtle use of “naturally” to reinforce gender stereotypes persists. It manifests in seemingly innocuous ways, such as in advertising that portrays women as naturally inclined towards beauty and domesticity, or in career advice that suggests women are naturally better suited for certain professions, such as teaching or nursing. This is insidious. It perpetuates limitations. We need to be vigilant in identifying and challenging these subtle forms of bias.
Consider the tech industry, where the underrepresentation of women is often attributed to a lack of “natural” aptitude for STEM fields. This ignores the systemic barriers that women face in pursuing these careers, including gender bias in hiring, promotion, and mentorship opportunities. It also ignores the fact that many women excel in these fields, demonstrating that talent and aptitude are not determined by gender. How many potential female coders, engineers, and scientists have been dissuaded from pursuing their passions because they were told that it wasn’t “natural” for them?
The “natural” argument is also frequently invoked in discussions about parenting and family roles. Women who choose to prioritize their careers over motherhood are often judged harshly, accused of neglecting their “natural” instincts. Men who take on a more active role in childcare are often praised for being exceptional, rather than simply fulfilling their responsibilities as parents. These double standards are deeply ingrained in our culture and reinforce the idea that women are primarily responsible for childcare, regardless of their professional aspirations. Let’s normalize men taking paternity leave. Let’s normalize shared parental responsibilities. Let’s create a society where both parents are valued for their contributions, both inside and outside the home.
IV. The Impact on Feminist Praxis: Undermining Our Collective Liberation
The insidious nature of the “natural” argument poses a significant challenge to feminist praxis. By framing gender inequality as an inevitable consequence of biological difference, it undermines the very foundation of our struggle. If women are “naturally” less capable of leadership, then why bother fighting for equal representation in politics and business? If men are “naturally” more aggressive, then why bother addressing issues of toxic masculinity and gender-based violence?
Furthermore, the “natural” argument can lead to internalised sexism, where women internalize negative stereotypes about their own abilities and potential. This can manifest as a lack of confidence, a reluctance to assert themselves, or a tendency to downplay their accomplishments. Internalised sexism is a formidable obstacle to feminist progress, as it prevents women from fully realizing their potential and advocating for their own rights. We must actively combat internalised sexism by challenging our own beliefs and behaviors, and by supporting and empowering other women.
The constant bombardment of “natural” narratives can also lead to feminist fatigue, a sense of exhaustion and disillusionment that can undermine our collective activism. When faced with seemingly insurmountable obstacles, it is easy to become discouraged and to question whether meaningful change is even possible. It is crucial to remember that progress is not linear. We will face setbacks and resistance. But we must never give up the fight. We must continue to challenge the “natural” narrative and to advocate for a more just and equitable world. Embrace the power of collective action. Find strength in solidarity. Remember that we are not alone in this struggle.
V. Reclaiming the Narrative: A Feminist Reimagining of “Naturally”
Perhaps, the most powerful way to combat the misuse of “naturally” is to reclaim the word itself. Let us redefine it not as a justification for inequality, but as a celebration of the natural diversity and complexity of human experience. Let us recognize that it is “natural” for women to be strong, intelligent, ambitious, and independent. Let us celebrate the “natural” empathy, compassion, and vulnerability of men. Let us embrace the full spectrum of human emotions and experiences, without imposing arbitrary gendered limitations.
Let us also acknowledge the *natural* urge for justice, the *natural* inclination toward empathy, and the *natural* resistance to oppression that resides within us all. These are the forces that drive our feminist struggle. These are the forces that will ultimately lead us to liberation. We have the *natural* right to exist without patriarchal pressure.
Let us use “naturally” to describe the innate desire for autonomy, the instinctive rejection of oppression, and the unwavering commitment to justice that fuels our feminist movement. Let us create a world where it is naturally accepted that all individuals, regardless of gender, are entitled to equal rights, equal opportunities, and equal respect. This is not a utopian fantasy; it is a realistic goal that can be achieved through persistent effort and collective action. Question the status quo. Amplify marginalized voices. Demand accountability from those in power. Together, we can create a world where “naturally” is synonymous with equality, liberation, and justice.
Leave a Comment